
Mike Schouten, senior director of provider marketing with Ingenix, shares his insights on the subject of yearly planning and budgeting.
One of the goals of the HealthB2BMarketing blog is to share best practices peer to peer. Since this month’s posts are on the topic of yearly planning and budgeting, I asked Mike Schouten, a friend and one of the most talented marketing leaders I know, to share his insights on the subject.
Mike is the senior director of provider marketing for Ingenix.
Don Seamons: In planning, everything depends on the budget. How would you recommend marketers make a case for budget dollars?
Mike Schouten: From my vantage point, the conversation starts with the question of how much value do we as marketers bring to the equation. By addressing the question of value, Marketing is positioned appropriately as a strategic component of a company’s growth. If value is overlooked, Marketing is placed in the perilous position of existing only as an expense. With that in mind, there are three key areas of focus for any organization to ensure that value is met from its marketing activities.
The first key is becoming a company’s source for market and customer intelligence. True b-to-b marketing is built on the knowledge of a company’s current customers as well as its prospects that are in the best position to buy.
The second key is developing internal alignment with Sales, Client Management and Product Management. A market-lead organization is one that is structured and aligned so that these functions work together to identify, engage and retain customers in a credible, effective way.
The third key is measurement. At every stage of the marketing process, the ability to measure puts Marketing leadership in the driver’s seat in managing the budget and proactively recommending changes to the marketing mix over time.
Don: As you develop your marketing mix, how do you factor in measurable marketing activities, such as lead generation, and activities that aren’t as easily measured, such as branding?
Mike: I believe that everything that we do as marketers can be measured, to a certain extent. Of course, some things are more measurable than others, but the reality is, if we deem something as worthy to invest in, it should also warrant a measure of accountability. The practical challenge is to determine as an aligned organization which measurements are essential to the success of the business.
The backbone of our b-to-b marketing infrastructure is our closed-loop marketing system. Tools that once cost large organizations millions of dollars to implement are now available to companies of all sizes through web-deployed systems. The ability to source campaigns and track the advancement of marketing leads from initial contact to subsequent signing of contract is amazingly powerful.
Of course, not all marketing activities feed as cleanly into our closed-loop system. Brand strength and company perceptions, for example, require separate research measures. No less specific, but very different. Client retention and satisfaction also requires separate research methods that allow us to score our performance across our entire customer base and identify areas for improvement.
The bottom line to me is to understand the progression of clients from their initial introduction to our company to their satisfaction after our services and/or technologies are put into place. With that progression mapped from beginning to end, the right measures are built around one, company awareness and perception, two, volume and effectiveness of lead generation efforts, and three, proof of ROI performance and overall client satisfaction.
Don: How would you recommend balancing the need to be innovative with the need to get a return on investment?
Mike: That’s an interesting question, given the proliferation of marketing tools at our disposal. Ten years ago, a typical b-to-b marketing mix entailed events, trade advertising (with print still more prominent than online), direct mail, a web 1.0 presence and print collateral. Contrast that to today’s available tools and the gravitational pull of social media, and it’s obvious that innovation drives us to change over time. I believe that innovation is essential to ROI success, so long as the ability to compare to prior results is built into the process.
I think it’s healthy for a company to recognize and acknowledge up front the portions of the marketing mix that are the most risky. A new event by an unproven vendor, a new social media effort that requires a 15% shift of marketing staff’s time, reduction in direct mail in favor of email marketing efforts, eliminating a client conference in favor of online client engagements via webinars, these are all examples of innovation that carry a certain level of risk. As a result, there are portions within a plan that I characterize as “Marketing R&D,” where the outcomes are uncertain, but promising.
Don: As the health care B2B market changes, to what media do you see more dollars flowing? At which medium’s expense?
Mike: Health care has moved more slowly than other industries, but it’s apparent that the role of print advertising is truly waning. Trade publishers have now fully embraced an integrated model, with events, online content and direct outreach efforts the core to their success. Of course, the web and social media are rapidly advancing, and I would expect within the next few years, that we’ll see some amazing marketing approaches developed there. The reality is that as contemporary communications evolve, the way we communicate with our customers is becoming more direct, with capabilities—and results—published more rapidly and frequently. This direct communication model favors webinars, case studies, Twitter updates, and video, built on a foundation of a web experience that is less about documenting every last thing that we do, and more about how we help solve the industry’s and our clients’ problems. Finally, as much as many of us marketers would like to see otherwise (due to the logistics and expense involved), the number of healthcare industry events is growing dramatically, rather than decreasing. This is being fueled by such hot topics in the industry as EHRs and meaningful use, changing reimbursement models, compliance challenges, and the looming switch to ICD-10.
Don: Planning is never an easy process. As a director, what do you do to make that process easier for the people you manage?
Mike: We work hard to align our planning activities to the broader calendar of activities that occur within the business units, in Sales, and with Finance. This is in order to reduce the number of iterations to the marketing plan, and to make sure that our focus is in line with the revenue and profitability targets set forth across the enterprise. We also invest in the right data in the form of market research, industry reports, and internal sales and lead data to give our teams the right information to shape a strategic plan. Finally, we recognize the time required to build a good plan. We start our planning activities for the next calendar year in August, and usually lock the plans down in mid-November.